The new islamophobia definition deals with symptoms not causes 5pillars 6 gas laws

#########

The APPG could hardly have denied the scale of the problem because prejudice and hatred of Islam and Muslims are the acceptable face of bigotry today, not just in Europe but globally, and has long been recognised by most fair-minded people and campaign groups. Comments by politicians and media reporting over the last few decades is testimony to that.

It’s not as if our politicians don’t understand persecution and victimisation based on faith. They talk about and take action about the persecution of Christians and other religious minorities around the world. They are also familiar with their own history, where once Catholics and other smaller sects were targeted and persecuted for their beliefs.

The task of defining and articulating Islamophobia is one that should ideally be left to Muslims, free from non-Muslim interference and involvement. gas vs electric stove cost The guiding principle should not be what parliamentarians and non-Muslims, or a secular academic framework is willing to endorse and accept. No self-respecting community allows other communities to define and contextualise the prejudice and hatred they face for them.

Ironically, when it comes to other minority or marginalised groups, restricting freedom to criticise and express certain opinions doesn’t seem to be much of an issue. Politicians are even prepared to restrict discussions on the state of Israel, and democracy under notions of hate and “extremism”. Of all communities in Britain, the minority Muslim community is subject to most restrictions when it comes to freedom of speech and association whilst the majority are allowed a virtual free hand against Muslims.

There was also a debate to be had about the role played by the War on Terror and its policies (in the UK) which also target Muslims for their “Muslimness” and the structural manifestations of “Islamophobia”. gas variables pogil key Presumably this definition, excludes those as examples of Islamophobia because politicians and the extremism industry can hide behind “criticism of Islam” and countering “Islamic extremism”.

Any definition that avoids mentioning Islam is itself a symptom of Islamophobia. Without Islam, Muslimness and Islamophobia are meaningless. It may allow those Muslims involved in politics and academia to have cosy discussions about prejudice and hate that Muslims face. electricity 2pm lyrics However, as any experienced anti-racism activist will tell you, you don’t defeat a prejudice by denying its very essence.

Islamophobia is not rooted in racism. Hatred of Islam and Muslims has always been politically and religiously generated and dates to well before the Crusades. This hatred is rooted in a specifically European and Christian reaction to the rise of Islam as a religious and political movement that challenged Western and Christian hegemony. Baroness Warsi is backing the new definition

Its modern reincarnation is very much in line with the past. electricity in the body symptoms It occurred after the fall of Communism, and especially after the “Islamic” Revolution in Iran, with the creation of what became known as the Green Peril. An entire industry complete with resources, policies, political, military and media support has been tirelessly working away to demonise Islam and Muslims for nearly four decades. 4 gas laws So why is anyone surprised at the rise of the far right and physical attacks on Muslims which are mere symptoms not causes?

Whilst some of this demonisation morphs into traditional racist tropes, and stereotyping, much doesn’t. Underlying tropes about Islam and violence, Islam and human rights abuses, Islam and sexuality are not rooted in racism, but straight from religious and political propaganda countering the early historical rise of Islam. All the far-right movements in the US and Europe use historical narratives that demonise Islam and Muslim.

Whilst much of the IHRA code on anti-Semitism can be applied to other types of bigotry, some of it cannot, and is opposed by anti-racist groups. Sections on nationalism, identity and the state of Israel, are disputed. It would be difficult for Muslims to argue against parts of the IHRA code, if they have accepted the logic for themselves. There was a need to make the examples more Islam specific.