Trump executive order 13840 – page 12 – saltwater fishing discussion board including inshore fishing, offshore fishing, saltwater fly fishing and kayak fishing gas approximation

#########

OK you speculate broadly and like the old saying goes even a blind squirrel can occasionally find an acorn. Yes you can be and might be sometimes right when most often you are wrong. Yes you can be right occasionally when just about everybody else (except of course yo daddy, or otherwise you wouldn’t be speculating in the first place) is wrong. 9gag The blind squirrel obviously finds an acorn that some other squirrel hasn’t already found. Simple facts and simple statistics.

The studies though on RoundUp as cancer causing is completely unconvincing and probably wrong. The ones I have seen have identified farm workers as more vulnerable to certain kinds of cancers. This is an issue shaded by past pesticide practices where far less studied substances were found to be potential vectors for these sorts of cancers and eventually banned, some perhaps rightly and assuredly some wrongly as there is far too much "opinion" involved and too little science.

On opinion, we ask Monsanto to conduct studies to determine the safeness of Round Up. They do it and then are accused of fudging the studies. We contribute to national environmental groups to fight this and what do they do with the money. They use it to get more money, not by finding answers but by loudly proclaiming opinions in the media to attract attention, sympathy, and more money. You seldom see them using the money to actually prove a problem, who needs proof? The science is settled!

So yeah Round Up is a potential problem but casually observing what the problem might be is very different than what you sell. specjalizacja z gastroenterologii Competition in the marketplace is what keeps products affordable and Round Up’s seed control efforts seems unfair in how they use lawsuits against growers for allegedly having a Monsanto plant in their fields. Finding the right balance between providing incentives to improve food production and the extent of ownership of the product through generations of use is a challenge.

On the plastics in the ocean, thats in general not the fault of the makers of packaging materials thats the fault of individuals buying the products and not properly disposing of them. But since non-point source pollution creates challenges to yo daddy’s fund raising efforts (hard to get contributions from those who yo daddy is calling out as being at fault) yo daddy has sold you on the idea its somebody else’s fault.

Why would I want to do that? As I see it Trump is getting it half right. Thats only relatively impressive compared to so much of getting nothing right because of rampant corruption. Anyway I doubt anybody else could do a better job than Sarah. Her experience in bringing up her 3 kids gives her an excellent background in how to handle the press. (you know the reporter bozos on your bozo bus?)

The process of science is in fact a process of one scientist (sometimes 2 or 3 working in close collaboration) proving all other scientists wrong. Galileo, Newton, Einstein, etc. proving conventional wisdom wrong in a moment of sudden and obvious discovery. electricity facts The type of science doesn’t matter. A young paleontologist individually chipping away at a rock suddenly uncovers a new fossil with a single strike of the hammer.

When you have a collaboration of 22 distant scientists IT is not a discovery IT is BS. 22 people banded together to run a con and convince the bozos on the bozo bus they have discovered something. The mark is impressed with all the credentials lined up on the author line and typically reads no further. IT is a con, a team of grifters playing the marks (the bozos on the bozo bus). You know how IT works you just haven’t grokked you are the mark so you dutifully market the study for them to your fellow bozos.

Science will go on. New superstars will arise with the single crack of a hammer or the solving of an enigma by some individual brainiac running figures on a blackboard or a computer, for entertainment in the meantime you will be entertained and perhaps fleeced by all those not discovering anything working in concert with IT and yo daddy as the Pied Piper.

The process of science is in fact a process of one scientist (sometimes 2 or 3 working in close collaboration) proving all other scientists wrong. Galileo, Newton, Einstein, etc. proving conventional wisdom wrong in a moment of sudden and obvious discovery. The type of science doesn’t matter. electricity distribution network A young paleontologist individually chipping away at a rock suddenly uncovers a new fossil with a single strike of the hammer.

When you have a collaboration of 22 distant scientists IT is not a discovery IT is BS. 22 people banded together to run a con and convince the bozos on the bozo bus they have discovered something. The mark is impressed with all the credentials lined up on the author line and typically reads no further. IT is a con, a team of grifters playing the marks (the bozos on the bozo bus). You know how IT works you just haven’t grokked you are the mark so you dutifully market the study for them to your fellow bozos.

Science will go on. New superstars will arise with the single crack of a hammer or the solving of an enigma by some individual brainiac running figures on a blackboard or a computer, for entertainment in the meantime you will be entertained and perhaps fleeced by all those not discovering anything working in concert with IT and yo daddy as the Pied Piper.

The process of science is in fact a process of one scientist (sometimes 2 or 3 working in close collaboration) proving all other scientists wrong. Galileo, Newton, Einstein, etc. proving conventional wisdom wrong in a moment of sudden and obvious discovery. The type of science doesn’t matter. A young paleontologist individually chipping away at a rock suddenly uncovers a new fossil with a single strike of the hammer.

When you have a collaboration of 22 distant scientists IT is not a discovery IT is BS. 22 people banded together to run a con and convince the bozos on the bozo bus they have discovered something. The mark is impressed with all the credentials lined up on the author line and typically reads no further. electricity physics IT is a con, a team of grifters playing the marks (the bozos on the bozo bus). You know how IT works you just haven’t grokked you are the mark so you dutifully market the study for them to your fellow bozos.

Science will go on. power outage houston zip code New superstars will arise with the single crack of a hammer or the solving of an enigma by some individual brainiac running figures on a blackboard or a computer, for entertainment in the meantime you will be entertained and perhaps fleeced by all those not discovering anything working in concert with IT and yo daddy as the Pied Piper.

The process of science is in fact a process of one scientist (sometimes 2 or 3 working in close collaboration) proving all other scientists wrong. Galileo, Newton, Einstein, etc. proving conventional wisdom wrong in a moment of sudden and obvious discovery. The type of science doesn’t matter. A young paleontologist individually chipping away at a rock suddenly uncovers a new fossil with a single strike of the hammer.

When you have a collaboration of 22 distant scientists IT is not a discovery IT is BS. 22 people banded together to run a con and convince the bozos on the bozo bus they have discovered something. The mark is impressed with all the credentials lined up on the author line and typically reads no further. IT is a con, a team of grifters playing the marks (the bozos on the bozo bus). You know how IT works you just haven’t grokked you are the mark so you dutifully market the study for them to your fellow bozos.

Science will go on. New superstars will arise with the single crack of a hammer or the solving of an enigma by some individual brainiac running figures on a blackboard or a computer, for entertainment in the meantime you will be entertained and perhaps fleeced by all those not discovering anything working in concert with IT and yo daddy as the Pied Piper.