Turks (turkey) vs central asians who’s more turkic – page 5 electricity and magnetism notes

##

You do realize that Turks in Anatolia are nothing but a mix of Armenians, Iranians and Greeks? 25% of your population is Iranic due to native kurdish population, Armenians have inhabited Anatolia for a long time (longer than Turkic languages have existed) and western turkey was inhabited by Greeks. Turks are just another branch of West Asians/middle easterns speaking an altaic language which is clearly related to other East Asian languages like Japanese and Korean. The turks who look Europid are simply decendants of ancient Greeks and modern balkanoid slaves which the Ottomans mass imported into mainland Anatolia. Stop feeding yourself lies. African Americans living in the US aren’t Anglo saxons just because they speak English. They are ethnically Africans. Turks are related to the people around them, Armenians, Iranians and southern Greeks. Haplogroups like R1b, J2 and G are all heavily concentrated in these 3 countries. Phenotype wise, they all overlap with one another.Haplogroups have nothing to do with autosomal admixture. For example, due to Spaniards taking Amerindian wives, tons of Mexicans, if not most, are R1b, the Spanish clades. But Spaniards have nothing to do with Mexicans autosomally, it’s two different worlds. So it’s the same with R1b, J2, and G.

Haplogroups have nothing to do with autosomal admixture. For example, due to Spaniards taking Amerindian wives, tons of Mexicans, if not most, are R1b, the Spanish clades. But Spaniards have nothing to do with Mexicans autosomally, it’s two different worlds. So it’s the same with R1b, J2, and G.

Anyway, this thread is not about this kind of conversation, so let’s not ruin it.Well this discussion ties in very well with this topic. The whole point is that the textbook turk is described as an east Asian (southern Siberian with Mongoloid features). Kazakhs, Uzbeks and western mongols all share direct ancestry with proto turks whom originated in East Asia.

Look very closely at the graph you posted, Istanbul average is very close to other balkanoids, these are the remaining ancient Greeks and European slaves which the Ottomans clearly imported from eastern Europe and the Balkans. There is no doubt that the ottomans took Europeans and enslaved them in mainland Anatolia. It is a fact which everyone has admitted to, including turks themselves. How could one claim that turks from Istanbul are more Turkic than Kazakhs? They are Europeans decendants of European slaves speaking an east Asian language for gods sake.

Anatolians themselves are native to West Asia and share similarities with the people around them like the Kurds, Persians, Armenians and southern Greeks whom inhabited the western coast of turkey 2500 years ago! This is before proto turks had even migrated into central Asia. Turkey has been a massive melting pot of surrounding tribes and ethnicities for thousands of years. There is absolutely nothing turkic about turkey. Turks by definition are east Asian mongoloids (slanted eyed Siberian tribes).

Turkish is part of the altaic language family, linguistics have made deep connections between altaic languages and other East Asian languages like Korean and Japanese. How does anything Turkic have to do with west asia, and especially Europe?

You do realize that Turks in Anatolia are nothing but a mix of Armenians, Iranians and Greeks? 25% of your population is Iranic due to native kurdish population, Armenians have inhabited Anatolia for a long time (longer than Turkic languages have existed) and western turkey was inhabited by Greeks. Turks are just another branch of West Asians/middle easterns speaking an altaic language which is clearly related to other East Asian languages like Japanese and Korean. The turks who look Europid are simply decendants of ancient Greeks and modern balkanoid slaves which the Ottomans mass imported into mainland Anatolia. Stop feeding yourself lies. African Americans living in the US aren’t Anglo saxons just because they speak English. They are ethnically Africans. Turks are related to the people around them, Armenians, Iranians and southern Greeks. Haplogroups like R1b, J2 and G are all heavily concentrated in these 3 countries. Phenotype wise, they all overlap with one another.It’s worth noting African Americans score on average anywhere between 5-15% NW European,most of which is British. I believe Turks have a similar proportion of Turkic ancestry.