Uspto seeks further public input on patent subject matter eligibility _ patently-o

From the USPTO: The U.S. Hp gas online complaint Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced that as part of its effort to solicit input from the public regarding the legal contours of patent subject matter eligibility, it will be holding two roundtables, one in November and one in December.

“In recent years, the jurisprudence on the very basic issue of what is patent eligible subject matter has been evolving requiring adjustments by innovators, businesses, lower courts and administrative agencies such as the USPTO,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Michelle K. Gas exchange in the lungs happens by the process of Lee. Gas evolution reaction “Our goal is to minimize any uncertainty in the patent system by ensuring we not only continue to apply the statute and case law in this area as faithfully as possible, but also understand the impact of the jurisprudence on innovation by assessing what, if any, changes might be helpful to further support innovation.”

In a notice published today in the Federal Register, the USPTO announced that it will begin a nationwide conversation on patent eligible subject matter through two roundtable discussions. La gasolina mp3 The first roundtable will be held November 14, 2016, at the USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. J gastroenterol impact factor This roundtable will focus on the USPTO’s continuing efforts to seek input from across the country and across industries on how the USPTO can improve the agency’s subject matter eligibility guidance and training examples. A gas has To facilitate a broader legal discussion on the contours of patentable subject matter, the USPTO will host a second roundtable on December 5, 2016, at Stanford University in Stanford, California. Electricity storage cost per kwh Through the power of USPTO’s nationwide footprint, each of our regional offices will also participate in both roundtables, enabling individuals and industries from around the country to share their perspectives at a location closest to them, in addition to written submissions.

Together, these roundtables will help facilitate discussion on patent subject matter eligibility in view of several decisions in recent years by the courts. 4 gases in the atmosphere If you wish to attend or participate in a roundtable, please see the Federal Register notice to learn more. Gas near me app You may also visit the USPTO’s Events Page.

I hope I will be forgiven for saying that much Section 101 comment up to now has been dire, and suggests that many practitioners remember little that they learned at law school.

In early 2014 the USPTO published eligibility guidelines which gave rise to a storm of comment. Electricity 2pm A seminar was held at the USPTO and broadcast online, at the conclusion of which Drew Hirshfeld asked for detained comments on the guidelines and specially emphasized the need for additional examples which might be useful in preparing training materials.

In addition to twelve pages of comment suggesting an alternative approach I created six detailed examples analysed in accordance with the principles set out in the guidance but showing how allowable subject matter could be identified in a range of life sciences inventions including a purified medicament which was a natural product, a DNA sequence which was a plasmid isolated from a bacterium, Louis Pasteur’s purified yeast which was noted by the Supreme Court in Chakrabarty, gunpowder as a combination of natural products, an expanded claim set based on the fact pattern in Funk Brothers v Kalo. Z gas tecate In each case the example was referred to the corresponding issued US patent or judicial decision.

Of the more than 60 other comments filed, only ONE included the additional examples requested by Drew Hirshfeld, and only a minority contained detailed and useful analysis.

I have repeatedly urged that in trying to improve 101 analysis, we should not simply shoot off our prejudices, but should carefully and systematically study the relevant decisions, identify the rules of law relied on and then look for the ways in which eligible subject matter can be identified and we can improve our patent drafting. Gas leak explosion What Michelle Lee needs is not just a set of ego-trips but helpful and thoughtful analysis and proposals which point towards a better and more practical way forward.

Discuss it directly. K electric bill payment online The serious controversy isn’t about the eligibility of “machines” or “processes.” There’s no reason that you can’t prohibit patents that protect software (directly or indirectly) and still have a vibrant healthy patent system and plenty of progress promotion. Electricity bill calculator There’s also no real controversy (except in few tiny corners of the blogosphere) over the fact that some software patents should absolutely not be eligible for reasons that are so obvious they’re not worth discussing (unless you want to also discuss patenting “new books” based on the “new information” stored in them).

The first real controversy is whether any new software should be protectable — directly or indirectly — with patents, period. Electricity in costa rica voltage Many people believe that the best answer is “no.” I belong to that camp and I’ve justified my views here for years by presenting a combiation of legal and policy arguments very similar to those presented by Judge Mayer in his recent concurrence.

The second set of issues is, if you are absolutely unwilling to abide what seems to me to be an obvious ending to this story — i.e., no software protection in our patent system — then the question is exactly what do you want to protect and what rules do you want enacted to ensure that protection is provided fairly. Electricity facts You absolutely can’t ignore escape the fact that information and logic are different from what our patent system was designed to protect. Grade 9 electricity formulas If you want some kind of patent protection for logic, there has to systemic changes, from the ground up, in how these types of claims are presented for examination, and how they are enforced. Gas 1981 Without that, we are left with judges and a PTO trying to lasso a rampaging elephant without ever seeming to acknowledge that their using a five inch long piece of dental floss. Youtube gas monkey What we end up then — and what we have ended up with — is a mile-high disaster of junk. Gas x reviews ratings Sadly, the mountain of junk takes the focus off the bigger issue which is how did this disaster occur and how to put an end to it.

Then you have to fold in the fact that there is this group of patent attorneys out there who are very deeply and personally invested (financially) in keeping the gravy flowing, regardless of the consequences to the credibility and functioning of the system as a whole.

These are the issues. N gas in paris lyrics If you want to attack strawmen about “machines” and “processes”, then go ahead. Gas 4 less manhattan ks That’s ultimately a l0sing game for you (not speaking of “you” personally, but “you” as in “person who wants some software patent protection”). Gas laws worksheet answers chemistry Either you’ve noticed this already (assuming you’re capable of noticing anything — again, not “you” personally) or you simply don’t care because all you want is to borrow time.

creating an abstract of said at least one reference signal wherein the step of creating an abstract of said at least one reference signal comprises:

inputting the reference signal to a processor; creating an abstract of the reference signal using perceptual qualities of the reference signal such that the abstract retains a perceptual relationship to the reference signal from which it is derived;

creating an abstract of the at least one query signal using perceptual qualities of the at least one query signal such that the abstract retains a perceptual relationship to the at least one query signal from which it is derived; and

comparing the abstract of said at least one query signal to the abstract of said at least one reference signal to determine if the abstract of said at least one query signal matches the abstract of said at least one reference signal.

In other words, compare the “perceptual qualities” of two signals. Gas constant Perceptual qualities, according to the spec, are those qualities that are “humanly perceptible”. Gasbuddy login But the wonderful “machine” that performs this method has a “feature selector” that can identify all, or nearly all, of the “perceptual qualities” of the object that differentiate it from a similarly selected object of other signals. Electricity questions grade 6 And there’s nothing circular or self-enabling about this g@rbage claim! Nope. E85 gas stations florida It’s all superstar science.