V1 drones during the battle of britain page 3 alternate history discussion gas leak los angeles

#########

Click to expand…I believe I pointed out that AI MK. III was superceded, in short order, by the MK. IV and, latterly q gastrobar leblon, by the centimetric sets beginning with the MK. VII MK. VIII – all of which were in service before the US entry in the conflict. The MK. IV being very successful indeed, whilst still operating in the metre wavelength range. Nonetheless, the Mk. III, whilst limited (particularly by its minimum range) was far better than ‘not really useful’ as you suggest – indeed, the wiki entry you quote electricity cost by state doesn’t even mention the MK.III, does it??

The VT fuse was far from a ‘laboratory only’ model – they were field tested, with initial batches produced in the UK too. The valve (tube) design (by John Cockroft at Pye) was subsequently improved for mass production by Berkner eventually incorporated into already extant valves (for hearing aids, no less) produced by Western Electric RCA. Nothing here is beyond the technical capacity of the UK in a world where the priorities are different.

I think you’ll find that very few aircraft (much less those at the very cutting edge) are blessed with a perfect, trouble free development. In the case of the Meteor, none of the issues encountered were considered serious – and z gas el salvador precios particularly not the compressibility associated with the original ‘short’ nacelle, that you seem to have latched on to. Furthermore, the Meteor would not require a ‘rushed’ development at all, merely one conducted at a normal pace. The development of the Meteor was very much secondary to that of those types already serving, and as such, was allocated none of the resources which could well have been brought to bear, had such a pressing need arisen.

Click to expand…No, the MK. III isn’t ‘barely mentioned’ in the article – it isn’t mentioned AT ALL. The MK. IV was not merely successful compared to the MK. III, it was successful, period. Also worthy of note, is that the first US contribution gasbuddy va to the AI program was Western Electric’s SCR720B, which appeared in December 1942 (one set, for trials)- over a year after the introduction of the solely UK designed built, centimetric MK. VII.

You know, if you’re going to rely on wiki for your attempted rebuttals, you really should take the trouble to read the article to which you so eagerly thermal electricity how it works link first… If you’d done that, you’d realise that amongst the designs taken to the US as part of Tizard’s mission, were such items as ASDIC (sonar), gyroscopic sights, self sealing fuel tanks, plastic explosives (various flavours), cavity magnetron etc, etc. I’m pretty sure that even the most simplistic account of the war will reveal that all these things gas efficient cars 2015 were in service use before Tizard co left these shores, so rather far from ‘laboratory items’ by any definition.

The British ordered 20,000 special miniature tubes from Western Electric Company and Radio Corporation of America, and an American team under Admiral Harold G. Bowen, Sr. correctly deduced gas dryer vs electric dryer that the tubes were meant for experiments with proximity fuzes. [3] The details of these experiments were passed to the United States Naval Research Laboratory and National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) by the Tizard Mission in September 1940, in accordance with an informal agreement between Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt to exchange scientific information of potential military value. [

‘The VT fuse was far from a ‘laboratory only’ model – they were field tested, with initial batches produced in the UK too. The valve (tube) design (by John Cockroft at Pye) was subsequently improved for mass production by Berkner eventually incorporated into already extant valves (for hearing aids, no less) produced by Western Electric RCA. Nothing here is beyond the technical capacity gas x strips walmart of the UK in a world where the priorities are different.’

Now, the key point here is my final line in the above statement – ‘Nothing here is beyond the technical capacity of the UK in a world where the priorities are different’. That is, where the priorities might differ in any alternate timeline, there is no reason – either of manufacturing electricity lyrics or the science behind it, why Pye (or any other capable organisation, for that matter – of which there are many), should not produce VT fuses, albeit at the (disruptive) expense of another (presumably deemed less pressing prescient in an ATL) product, or any other, understood technology as might be required.

Going back to the Meteor, you seem not to have taken on board what I said in my earlier post at all. ‘Problems’ (of any sort) did not prevent the aircraft reaching service release until 1944, rather, the perceived lack of need, OTL, did. The program was drip fed, if you gas efficient cars will, on minimal resources (at least until the first Fi 103’s start to appear OTL) simply because those types already in service were adequate (and with comfortably established production routines / tempos) for the then understood threat operational needs.