View profile morrus – morrus’ unofficial tabletop rpg news electricity billy elliot backing track

#########

This phenomenon of people quoting DD Beyond stats to prove points happens the most right after they post some of their data. Those posts and threads are months old at this electricity jeopardy powerpoint point and so I’m not going to dig them up. However, there’s been comments about their data in more recent threads, but it’s not important enough to go digging through pages and pages of comments looking for the proverbial needle in the haystick that I know is there (because I’ve recently read it) just to prove you wrong. Instead I’ll give you one current example.

People also use invalid math to prove points. Example: Average DPR with % hit, we have talked about it before that this is not an acute representation of actual game play damage being that average DPR is only correct about 3% of the time for any specific battle, does not account for 0 sum damage on miss, or loss of damage from over kill… however, I don’t have a better metric for measuring damage. So I use it too sometimes to prove a point as do you. The same is true for DD Beyond data. As @Morrus pointed out…

Yes which proves his point in that if post are a measure of validity Morrus’s 39,521 post to your 3,940 posts would make you a n00b and irrelevant if we are calling that a valid maker of knowledge base. Which we are not. So while your one of the more interesting posters to read you do have a tendency to get a bit dismissive of posters based on off point arguments like posts. I still came to your thread chapter 7 electricity and magnetism because you make interesting discussion and I heard you. I have even posted a on the DD Beyond feature requests asking for player inactive characters tags and a statement on slides listing the day delimiter so as we read slides we have a beater representation of what the slide is depicting gas apple pay. That said, questioning the validity of one someone says based on how much they said instead of the content of their argument makes you look bad, instead of making them look unqualified. If your going to say the statement was in jest… their is no indication in the text of the post that implies that and the person your posting to does not know you well enough to infer that …

This phenomenon of people quoting DD Beyond stats to prove points happens the most right after they post some of their data. Those posts and threads are months old at this point and so I’m not going to dig them up. However, there’s been comments about their data in more recent threads, but it’s not important enough to go digging through pages and pages of comments looking for the proverbial needle in the haystick that I know is there (because I’ve recently read it) just to prove you wrong. Instead I’ll give you one current example.

People also use invalid math to prove points. Example: Average DPR with % hit, we have talked gas equations chemistry about it before that this is not an acute representation of actual game play damage being that average DPR is only correct about 3% of the time for any specific battle, does not account for 0 sum damage on miss, or loss of damage from over kill… however, I don’t have a better metric for measuring damage. So I use it too sometimes to prove a point as do you. The same is true for DD Beyond data. As @Morrus pointed out…

Yes which proves his point in that if post are a measure of validity Morrus’s 39,521 post to your 3,940 posts would make you a n00b and irrelevant if we are calling that a valid maker of knowledge base. Which we are not. So while your one of the more interesting posters to read you do have a tendency to get a bit dismissive of posters based on off point arguments like posts. I still gas 85 vs 87 came to your thread because you make interesting discussion and I heard you. I have even posted a on the DD Beyond feature requests asking for player inactive characters tags and a statement on slides listing the day delimiter so as we read slides we have a beater representation of what the slide is depicting. That said, questioning the validity of one someone says based on how much they said instead of the content of their argument makes you look bad, instead of making them look unqualified. If your going to say the statement was in jest… their is no indication in the text of the post that implies that and the person your posting to does not know you well enough to infer that …

This phenomenon of people quoting DD Beyond stats to prove points happens the most right after they post some of their data. Those posts and threads are months old at this electricity test physics point and so I’m not going to dig them up. However, there’s been comments about their data in more recent threads, but it’s not important enough to go digging through pages and pages of comments looking for the proverbial needle in the haystick that I know is there (because I’ve recently read it) just to prove you wrong. Instead I’ll give you one current example.

People also use invalid math to prove points. Example: Average DPR with % hit, we have talked about it before that this is not an acute representation of actual game play damage being that average DPR is only gas prices map correct about 3% of the time for any specific battle, does not account for 0 sum damage on miss, or loss of damage from over kill… however, I don’t have a better metric for measuring damage. So I use it too sometimes to prove a point as do you. The same is true for DD Beyond data. As @Morrus pointed out…

Yes which proves his point in that if post are a measure of validity Morrus’s 39,521 post to your 3,940 posts would make you a n00b and irrelevant if we are calling that a valid maker of knowledge base. Which we are not. So while your one of the more interesting posters to read you do have a tendency to get a bit dismissive of posters based on off point arguments like posts. I still came to your thread because you make interesting discussion and I heard you. I have even posted a on the DD Beyond feature requests asking for player electricity storage cost per kwh inactive characters tags and a statement on slides listing the day delimiter so as we read slides we have a beater representation of what the slide is depicting. That said, questioning the validity of one someone says based on how much they said instead of the content of their argument makes you look bad, instead of making them look unqualified. If your going to say the statement was in jest… their is no indication in the text of the post that implies that and the person your posting to does not know you well enough to infer that …

This phenomenon of people quoting DD Beyond stats to prove points happens the most right after they post some of their data. Those posts and threads are months old at this point and so I’m not going to dig them up. However, there’s been comments gasco abu dhabi careers about their data in more recent threads, but it’s not important enough to go digging through pages and pages of comments looking for the proverbial needle in the haystick that I know is there (because I’ve recently read it) just to prove you wrong. Instead I’ll give you one current example.

People also use invalid math to prove points. Example: Average DPR with % hit, we have talked about it before that this is not an acute representation of actual game play damage being that average DPR is only correct about 3% of the time for any specific battle, does not account for 0 sum damage on miss, or loss of damage from over kill… however, I don’t have a better metric for measuring damage. So I use it too eon replacement gas card sometimes to prove a point as do you. The same is true for DD Beyond data. As @Morrus pointed out…

Yes which proves his point in that if post are a measure of validity Morrus’s 39,521 post to your 3,940 posts would make you a n00b and irrelevant if we are calling that a valid maker of knowledge base. Which we are not. So while your one of the more interesting posters to read you do have a tendency to get a bit dismissive of posters based on off point arguments like posts. I still came to your thread because you make interesting discussion and I heard you. I have even posted a on the DD Beyond feature requests asking for player inactive characters tags and a statement on slides listing the day delimiter so as we read slides we have a beater representation of what youtube gas pedal lyrics the slide is depicting. That said, questioning the validity of one someone says based on how much they said instead of the content of their argument makes you look bad, instead of making them look unqualified. If your going to say the statement was in jest… their is no indication in the text of the post that implies that and the person your posting to does not know you well enough to infer that …