Weekly economic and financial commentary incoming data reinforce slower pace of global growth automated forex robots and signals storing electricity in water

###########

Core inflation rose 0.19% in October after softer prints in the preceding months, which should alleviate fears that inflation has hit another soft patch. Core goods prices posted the largest monthly increase since January, unwinding some weakness from the previous month. Tariffs are a top-of-mind worry for goods prices, but the dollar’s climb this year should keep goods prices from rising too rapidly.

The rebound in core inflation suggests the underlying trend is modestly higher which should keep the Fed on course to gradually lift short term interest rates. While businesses are beginning to see a break on some commodity prices, tariffs and a tight labor market are pushing other costs higher. We expect core inflation to trend up in the year ahead, spurred by more businesses willing to raise prices.

The juggernaut of IP–manufacturing—posted a better than expected gain of 0.3% in October. Production for September was also revised a bit higher, and points to factory activity being on somewhat firmer ground than previously thought. Most major manufacturing categories posted gains over the month, with the notable exception of autos, where sales have softened this year. Despite the decent production numbers this month, there are hints that slowing global growth, a strong dollar and trade issues are beginning to weigh on manufacturing. On a year-over-year basis, manufacturing production growth slowed to 3.0%. U.S. Outlook

Housing starts dropped in September, with most of the decline stemming from a 15.2% drop in multifamily starts. But, single-family starts were also sluggish, declining a more modest 0.9%. Housing is unlikely to make a significant breakout to the upside at this point in the business cycle. Higher mortgage rates and steadily rising home prices have significantly reduced affordability. Rising input costs have made it more difficult to build homes at lower price points, where demand is strongest, and labor costs continue to rise amid a shortage of skilled construction workers.

Durable goods orders rose 0.7% in September, propelled by defense aircraft orders, which more than doubled, up 118.7%. electricity 2pm lyrics This coupled with a modest 0.5% bump in motor vehicle orders more than offset declines in commercial aircraft orders. Aside from defense aircraft, however, September orders were broadly modest. Nondefense excluding aircraft, orders and shipments were both down 0.1% over the month, the second monthly decline for both categories.

This week, however, we learned that business equipment production was up 0.8% in October, following a surge of 9.3% in Q3. While equipment spending was weaker than expected in Q3, we look for a rebound in Q4. The regional Fed manufacturing surveys thus far for October confirm orders holding up. A simple average of the Philadelphia, New York, Richmond, Kansas City and Dallas new orders components did fall 0.8 points in October, but remains near cycle highs.

Existing home sales fell for the sixth consecutive month in September. The continued slowdown in existing sales has not been wholly surprising. Pending home sales, mortgage purchase applications and the proportion of consumers stating now is a good time to buy a home have all been trending lower in recent months. Another dynamic at play are inventories, which had been trending lower for more than three years. With fewer homes for sale, existing home sales were destined to fall. gas mask ark The slide in home buying has coincided with rising mortgage rates and follows years of rapid price appreciation, which have collectively taken a toll on affordability.

Economic data released this week in parts of Asia were generally lackluster in nature. In Japan, real GDP contracted in Q3, with the 1.2% drop on an annualized basis a sharp reversal from the 3% annualized growth rate registered in Q2 (see chart on page 1). While much of the slowdown might be temporary in nature due to recent natural disasters weighing on output, multiple sectors still contributed to weakness in the broader economy. Notable declines in private consumption and non-residential investment were registered in Q3. In particular, non-residential investment spending declined at a 0.9% annualized pace over the quarter after a large jump in Q2. While a rebound in Q4 looks likely, we still only see the Japanese economy expanding at a sluggish pace over the next two years, as a proposed sales tax increase and other structural headwinds weigh on a more rapid pace of growth.

In China, growth in retail sales slowed in October, and while fixed investment spending and industrial output picked up slightly from a year ago, growth remains significantly lower than the doubledigit rates registered earlier in the expansion (top chart). The Chinese economy continues to remain a key point of concern in the global arena, as ongoing trade tensions with the U.S. weigh on the outlook amid a more fundamental domestic slowdown. We recently downgraded our growth forecasts for the next two years, and now look for real GDP to rise 6.1% in 2019 and 6.0% in 2020.

Turning to Europe, data released in the U.K. showed that inflation continues to move back toward the Bank of England’s 2% target, at 2.4% in October (middle chart). electricity voltage in germany As price pressures have receded after skyrocketing in the wake of the Brexit referendum in 2016, wage growth has begun to show signs of picking up. Average weekly earnings grew 3% year-over-year in September, the fastest pace of growth since 2015. However, retail sales data for October missed consensus estimates, declining 0.5% over the month. Although inflation is moving back toward target and wage growth is picking up, the U.K. economy continues to face uncertainty surrounding the ultimate fate of Brexit negotiations. While policymakers reportedly reached an agreement over the last major issue of the Irish border this week, the final deal must still be approved by U.K. parliament. This now looks to be more difficult, as key U.K. ministers resigned this week in the wake of the initial deal agreement. Our base case view is still for a deal to be approved before the March 2019 deadline, however we acknowledge that uncertainty is likely to persist both in finalizing an agreement before the deadline, and after as policymakers must then negotiate a more comprehensive U.K.-E.U. trade deal.

Finally, Mexico’s central bank raised its policy rate 25 bps to 8.00% this week in what appears to be a move to stem further currency depreciation (bottom chart). The Mexican peso has dropped more than 6% against the dollar since mid-October as uncertainty has risen surrounding the likely policy agenda of the incoming president. While in the near term economic fundamentals remain solid, with real GDP rising 2.6% year-overyear in Q3, longer-term growth prospects could be a concern amid restrictive financial conditions and ongoing political uncertainty. Global Outlook

Price pressures remain lackluster in Japan, with the CPI rising 1.2% year-over-year in September, while the core index increased just 1% for the same period. Core inflation has remained around 1% for several months, and persistently low inflation remains an issue for the Bank of Japan (BoJ). As such, interest rates have remained in negative territory as the bank has adopted unconventional monetary policy measures and amassed assets on its balance sheet that now total around 100% of GDP. At the same time, the economy contracted in Q3, with real GDP shrinking at a 1.2% annualized rate. Generally subdued economic growth has likely restrained a more rapid acceleration in price growth. In our view, the BoJ will continue to remain firmly accommodative until price pressures show signs of a convincing upward trend. This looks unlikely to happen anytime soon, and we look for the CPI to rise just 1.4% year-over-year in October.

The Markit PMIs in the Eurozone continue to trend lower, with the manufacturing PMI declining to 52.0 in October from 53.2 in September. Eurozone industrial production data largely confirm the survey data, with production growing less than 1% year-over-year in August after run rates surpassed 5% by the end of 2017. This slowing in production is indicative of the broader lackluster growth picture across much of Europe. Eurozone real GDP expanded at only a 0.7% annualized rate in Q3, the slowest since 2013. German GDP figures released this week showed an outright decline in Q3, while growth in Italy was broadly flat over the quarter. Concerns surrounding Italy’s fiscal situation and growth prospects remain on the forefront, and the European Central Bank will likely be watching next week’s PMI release for signs of a production rebound and stronger growth prospects as it looks to normalize policy in coming quarters.

Canadian inflation moderated in September, with headline inflation rising 2.2% year-over-year, lower than the 2.8% print registered in August. However, September’s drop was largely due to one-off factors, such as a pullback in typically higher summer airfare prices. Inflation has moved closer to the Bank of Canada’s (BoC) 2% target, and at its most recent policy announcement the BoC looked for inflation to remain near target through 2020 as other temporary factors such as higher oil prices and minimum wage increases should fade. Indeed, global oil prices have declined sharply in recent weeks, and point to lower price pressures going forward. At the same time, real GDP expanded at a solid 2.9% annualized pace in Q2, while wage growth has also remained steady enough. These measures point to a Canadian economy that is functioning with little slack. Given these fundamentals, we look for the BoC to hike rates three times in 2019, as inflation stays within target and growth remains sturdy.

The Federal Reserve has two objectives: “full employment” and “price stability.” To the extent that the value of the stock market affects those two variables, then the FOMC may change course. But as of this writing, the S&P 500 index is down only 7% or so from its peak in September. In our view, the decline in the stock market to date is not large enough to have a meaningful effect on the Fed’s two primary objectives. gas variables pogil key In other words, the FOMC probably won’t deviate from its publicly communicated tightening path, unless the downdraft in the stock market becomes much deeper.

The core rate of inflation followed the overall rate of inflation lower in 2015-16. However, there are reasons to expect that the core rate of inflation won’t respond as much this time around as then. First, oil prices nosedived about 80% between mid-2014 and early 2016. The decline thus far has been much less extreme. Second, the sharp rise in the value of the dollar, which rose roughly 30% in trade-weighted terms during the previous episode, helped to depress import prices. electricity office near me Third, the labor market today is much tighter than it was three years ago. Unless the core CPI inflation rate recedes, the FOMC is likely to continue on its path of gradual tightening.

Banks loosened lending standards in Q3 while demand for loans contracted, according to data released this week in the Fed’s Senior Loan Officer Survey. The supply of loanable funds remained strong as banks eased availability for commercial & industrial and residential loans, and left standards unchanged for CRE, auto and credit card lending. The most commonly cited reasons were increased competition among lenders and a generally sanguine outlook for economic activity.

Demand on the other hand was broadly weaker, particularly for residential loans. With mortgage rates up nearly one percentage point over the past year to near a seven-year high, this is not surprising. Residential investment has been a drag on GDP growth five of the past six quarters, and ongoing weakness in existing home sales portends further weakness. Firms reported reduced equipment investment as a major driver of the decline in demand, consistent with the underwhelming 0.8% pace of business fixed investment growth in Q3.

Banks also responded to a special question regarding the slope of the yield curve by indicating that the much discussed flattening over the past year has not impacted lending practices. However, if it were to moderately invert, they reported on net that they would tighten standards, viewing it as a signal of deteriorating economic conditions. With the 2yr-10yr U.S. Treasury spread hovering under 30 bps, this bears monitoring as a window into lending. Topic of the Week

Led by steep cutbacks in the mining and energy sector, business fixed investment spending went into a steep decline, culminating in the annualized growth rate of overall business fixed investment (BFI) falling in three consecutive quarters and the year-over–year rate also in outright decline in late 2015. There were questions being asked at the time about whether or not there was a “manufacturing recession.”

We argued at the time that the weakness was broadly concentrated in energy spending. Yes, there were knock-on effects in other industries, and BFI outside the mining sector also slowed, but it never slipped into negative territory on a year-over-year basis. Energy spending, however, went from an almost 8% share of BFI at the start of 2015, to less than 3% by the start of 2017.

In order for that to happen we’d need to see prices remain at current depressed levels for several months. Note in the bottom chart how spending cuts in the energy sector did not begin in earnest until the start of 2015, which was roughly six months after oil prices peaked in that cycle. If we are still below $60/barrel in the spring, we’d be less sanguine. For now, however, we are not rushing to make changes.