What you need to know about stricter chain-up rules tranbc gas constant for nitrogen


• Two outside drive tires must be chained for trucks with one, two, or three rear axles. If the truck has more than one rear drive axle, we recommend the chains be installed on the rear drive axle closest to the front (as shown in graphics) because the front will chew up the compact and create a rough surface for the subsequent tires. Depending on weight distribution, some drivers may prefer to put them on the drive axle(s) closest to the rear.

Now, we realize this is short notice for the trucking industry. electricity for refrigeration heating and air conditioning 9th edition answers That’s why CVSE officers will be educating commercial drivers over the coming months before implementing and enforcing stricter fines later this winter. We’re evaluating escalating fines for con-compliance; previously, not carrying chains or installing when required came with a set $121 fine.

Along with the stricter chain-up regulations, commercial vehicles are restricted from using the left lane northbound on the Coquihalla between Box Canyon and Zopkios. This is to prevent multiple spin-outs from closing the highway. In the event of a severe weather event, CVSE and traffic control will be directing commercial drivers to chain-up at the newly expanded Box Canyon Chain-up area.

I actually find this extremely troubling, especially since I have carried and used previously approved alternative traction devices. v gashi 2012 I always used the auto socks ever since I seen the testing video’s in Denver and Sweden. When you compare traction with ease of use I find they beat out chains, especially for someone with a bad lower back that can’t handle leaning over tires with a set of doubles. Or that runs equipment with rear fenders that doesn’t allow the use of 4 singles. I don’t see how it’s fair to punish everyone, when you yourself mentioned people weren’t putting chains on properly or not at all. That’s just a laziness issue that your now using to punish all of us. Like I said before I’ve used my Autosocks, I was stopped at the bottom of an ice covered hill, I put them on and locked my rear axle, put the truck in gear and not once did a single tire slip, I actually had to swerve around other spin outs or guys spinning out who threw chains, because chains don’t cover the entire tire surface.

I think this was a poorly thought out decision, your issue was no one was making sure the chains were on, and done properly, so now you’re doing what I think should be illegal and changing the law after the season started and most of us already spent money to have our equipment ready to go, only to tell us we need to change what we are carrying. I’m not threatening anything, but don’t be surprised if you get lawsuits for changing a law without notice after it was in effect. Especially from guys who just like above. electricity song lyrics HAVE EQUIPMENT HARD MOUNTED TO THEIR TRUCKS AND CANNOT HAVE IT REMOVED CHEAPLY. Which leads me to my 1 question, is BC ever going to allow alternative devices again once they realise the issue was never the law, but the fact that guys were just lazily putting chains on, or not using them at all like your study said?

Thank you very much, I really do appreciate the fact that I have been carrying alternative traction devices for more than three years now, approved by British Columbia. My autosocks which were approved up until this update have never ever left me stuck anywhere. it’s a quick 5 minutes out of the truck all four exterior Drive tires done all my axles locked up, and then up the hill I go with absolutely no slippage of the sort. So I really do appreciate you guys updating the law and making it illegal for me to even travel in your province without having to install costly chain hangers, and buy steel chains just to never throw them due to lower back problems. I would strongly recommend you guys looking into approved alternatives meeting certain conditions. As I have mentioned my alternative traction devices have never left me sitting anywhere and I normally gross 46500 kgs. I would also take the moment to add that a traction device approved literally everywhere else should be more than adequate, especially considering some of the locations they are approved received more snowfall then the Coquihalla. What you have is an issue with driver training. I do have a question though, are you guys looking to reinstate the use of certain approved alternatives? Or is this a non-compromisable update?

First of all, thank you for improving the chaining up for the steep hill above the snowshed. electricity lessons grade 6 Will be nice to see people puting on adequate chains… or any chains for that matter… to climb the pathetically maintained snowshed hill. You are indeed to be congratulated for punishing the taxpaying drivers of BC for the shortcomings of the private, for profit contractor who has been “caught unaware” by so many snowstorms that were forcast days in advance.

However, I would like to say thank you to the ministry for exposing me to potentially fatal conditions on the rest of the undermaintained highway 5. The company I work for actually cares about us drivers and as such, all of our highway tractors have come equipped with automatic chaining devices on both drive axles and winter/snow rated tires. gas and bloating For the past several years, there has been only one or two occasions where we have not made it up snowshed hill using those automatic chains on our A-train configued units. Those occasions were due only to failures of other systems and not the automatic chains. The exposure to fatal danger is when climbing other hills along the Coquahalla and/or the Okanogan Connector where chainups are not manditory and no chainup area is provided. If those hills… Larson Hill, Comstock Hill, Hamilton Hill, and the 2 hills climbing out of Kamloops and Kelowna… are icy and require that chains be used for assistance, I now have to exit my cab onto a highway occupied by other vehicles and risk my life puting chains on by tractor manually.

I understand the need to have more effective chaining with the ever decreasing quality of the road maintenance, but why can’t a compromise not be reached in this? Why can’t a set of single chains be applied to all 4 outer drive tires and the automatic chains on both axles be required to provide traction to the inner tires? This would mean that all 8 tires would have coverage and that has to be as effective as having 6 tires covered with conventional chains.