Why is modern art so bad – page 61 gaz 67b tamiya 1 35

########

Postmodernism, in the arts and design, is a phenomenon of the last 25 years, originating in the electricity definition chemistry West but now spreading throughout the world. Whereas modernism consisted of dozens of individual ‘movements’, each with a rigorous artistic dogma and a programme for changing the world, postmodernism is individualistic and anarchic. We live today in a pluralist society, surrounded by images and artefacts from all periods and of all geographical and cultural locations. We are aware of the entire experience of the human race in ways that were not available to previous generations, and we have means and techniques of artistic creation which simultaneously include and beggar all those of the past. We are inheritors of the artistic and personal licence so energetically preached in the 1960s: philosophical, ethical and social libertarianism is the new orthodoxy.

In the arts, this has led to an unprecedented upsurge of eclecticism. Artists are as wary of ‘isms’ as their great-grandparents were eager gas lighting urban dictionary to embrace them. ‘Doing your own thing’ is, for many artists, where creativity begins and boundaries between arts, and between different branches or hierarchic levels of the same art are nowadays of minimal relevance. Stylistic interpenetration is the norm, in particular between what used to be thought of as ‘high’ art and ‘genre’ art.

There is, in short, not a postmodernist movement but a continuum. There are no boundaries save our own individual competence; creator and spectator are locked together in a conspiracy against history, against geography and against specificity, which may be seen as liberating or destructive (the lunatics 9gag memes taking over the asylum), but which is entirely without precedent in the story of the arts.This topic was discussed in considerable depth by Leonard Meyer in his groundbreaking book, Music, The Arts, and Ideas, 1967. Meyer looked about him and saw that, out of the buzzing, random, Brownian motion flux of directionless all-direction trends in the arts, a new stasis 93 gas near me was emerging. But this is a stasis unlike previous and long periods of cultural stasis where a single or a few dominant artistic and cultural trends slowly, glacially evolve over centuries or even millennia, and change can barely be detected. The new stasis is typified instead by constant, unending change; each new pulse of short duration and limited number of adherents, and none long-lived or robust enough to break through the stasis and impose a new, dominant cultural direction. Again, I recommend Meyer’s work on this subject, though much of it is densely written and can be heavy going.

I’m curious if anyone is interested in other intellectual trends since postmodernism national gas average 2007. There’s still a lot of discussion that could fairly be described as postmodern, but a lot of people now seem to be more interested in ideas with a more technocratic edge, if I can put it like that: systems theory, network theory, complexity, etc. The writings of Niklas Luhmann, for example, offer a theory of communication that contrasts very strongly with postmodern theory. The titles of a lot of recent art books suggest the importance of some of these different ways of looking at things.I don’t know about those things, but it sounds like you’re talking about science or technology. Not many people would take a truly postmodern approach to science anymore npower electricity bill. Modernism (or, perhaps better, the Enlightenment) has recovered, albeit informed by postmodern criticism, more careful about the social significance of its ideas or the way it expresses its ideas. The one really great exception to this – curiously, considering that postmodernism has been affiliated with the left – is the American extreme right. They really do have a postmodern approach to science and empirical truth generally.

Nereffid- Postmodernism, in the arts and design, is a phenomenon of the last 25 years, originating in the West but now spreading throughout the world. Whereas modernism consisted of dozens of individual ‘movements’, each with a rigorous artistic dogma and a programme for gas gangrene changing the world, postmodernism is individualistic and anarchic. We live today in a pluralist society, surrounded by images and artefacts from all periods and of all geographical and cultural locations. We are aware of the entire experience of the human race in ways that were not available to previous generations, and we have means and techniques of artistic creation which simultaneously gas house edwards include and beggar all those of the past. We are inheritors of the artistic and personal licence so energetically preached in the 1960s: philosophical, ethical and social libertarianism is the new orthodoxy.

In the arts, this has led to an unprecedented upsurge of eclecticism. Artists are as wary of ‘isms’ as their great-grandparents were eager to embrace them. ‘Doing your own thing’ is, for many artists, where creativity begins and boundaries between arts, and between different branches or hierarchic levels of the same art are nowadays of minimal relevance. Stylistic interpenetration is the norm, in particular between what static electricity images used to be thought of as ‘high’ art and ‘genre’ art.

There is, in short, not a postmodernist movement but a continuum. There are no boundaries save our own individual competence; creator and spectator are locked together in a conspiracy against history, against geography and against specificity, which may be seen as liberating or destructive (the lunatics taking over the asylum), but which is entirely without precedent in the story of the arts.

We live today in a pluralist society, surrounded by images and artefacts from all periods and of all geographical and cultural locations. We are aware of the entire experience of the human race in ways that were not available gas x breastfeeding side effects to previous generations, and we have means and techniques of artistic creation which simultaneously include and beggar all those of the past.

I would suggest that while Modernism certainly could boast of many more homogeneous movements, in reality it was nearly as individualistic as Post-Modernism. Many of the various movements (Cubism, Fauvism, Expressionism, Geometric Abstraction, etc…) could be broken down into sub-movements such as Der Blaue Reiter, Die Brücke, New Objectivity, French Expressionism, etc… under the larger movement of Expressionism. In many of these instances, the individual sub-movements and individual artists had quite opposing philosophies. Even if we look at Impressionism, which is often thought of as an easy to define style/movement, we have very different styles and artistic intentions/goals. Degas famously disliked Monet… and one can easily understand his view when you compare their works and their intentions electricity trading jobs.

Post-Modernism doesn’t think anything. Post-Modernism is simply a blanket term employed by academics (and others) in an attempt to categorize artists and art works of the last 50 years or so, working in a period and with philosophies or artistic intentions that they see as fundamentally different from what went before: Modernism. Post-Modern Art is the product of a vast array of individual artists with vastly different visions and intentions… a good majority of whom couldn’t give the least concern over how academics categorize electricity 101 presentation them… whether they are Post-Modern, Neo-Geo, Minimalist, Hyper-realist, Photo-realist, New Subjectivity, Neo-Expressionist, Pattern Painters, Post-Pop, Pop-Surrealist, Lowbrow, Kitsch Art, etc…

Returning like an old dog to a favorite, well-chewed bone, I (again) recommend Ortega y Gasset’s seminal book, The Revolt of the Masses, wherein he describes the erosion, or overthrow, or decay of the aristocracies of taste that formerly dictated artistic standards and directions. De Tocqueville first noted the trend in the 1830s of average Americans to consider themselves to be arbiters of taste (or anything else) equal to anyone with pretensions of superiority. Ortega 76 gas station locations y Gasset saw this trend spreading everywhere around him: an assertive development and endorsement by the masses of mass tastes, and, by extension, of the primacy of individual tastes. As this anything goes in culture and the arts impulse spreads throughout societies, it simultaneously encountered a parallel rise in instantaneous, mass communication, so that brand-new ideas can be instantly known pass gas in spanish to everyone everywhere. In order for a truly new school or movement to arise, fully develop, strengthen, and then spread beyond its borders to influence a wider population, it must be allowed a period of relative isolation and obscurity hidden away from the outside din of competing ideas. The New Stasis reflects the fact that such isolation allowing the conditions for development of robust new cultural trends, is now virtually impossible. The New Stasis is the end state of the marriage of total cultural mass equality with total, instantaneous mass communication. Hard to determine how, or if ever when, the pattern will be broken.