Why is science important – quora gas dryer vs electric dryer singapore


Not all science has an immediate payoff. Some science discovers what we call fundamental knowledge. This is knowledge in how our universe works. Not even in how molecules interact, but in how molecules are made. Fundamental knowledge is important because it shows us how protons and neutrons are made. It shows us if our theories of gravity are right. It helps us understand how waves of light (or radiation) interact with our bodies.

It takes decades, if not centuries to put that fundamental knowledge into action. But once we have the knowledge, and we create the applications, it is hard to imagine life without it. Imagine a world where we did not know about the existence of x-rays, and could not look at broken bones on a doctors screen to help heal the injured.

Who knows what applications will come of the discovery of the Higgs boson, or of the confirmation that heavy objects warp space, like pebbles ripple water. Our grandchildren’s grandchildren, however, might not be able to imagine a world without those discoveries.

Science is important because it creates the new technologies. From self-driving cars to Martian rovers, nano-sized cancer zappers, origami folded prosthetic limbs, light controlled brains, even quantum computing – there is no shortage of places that science is going towards today.

It might seem crazy to think of a world without the internet, yet just a few decades ago it didn’t even exist. The internet, as we know it, really started to take form in the 1970s, as scientists tried to transmit messages from one computer to another. Each computer, however, had to be connected to each other. If you wanted to talk to ten people this way, you would need ten computers to do so.

Imagine what your living room might look like if they decided that it was good enough and they could stop their work. In science, there is never a good enough. Your living room thanks you, as you can talk to millions of people with just one single terminal, just one single computer.

After years more of progress in training computers to talk to each other and developing the framework for a network the world was given the internet. Of course, this still wasn’t the internet as we know it, but it was a huge step, and a great tool for scientists to share their knowledge, experimental data, and published papers.

All of the science that has impacted your life has gone through a process called peer review. That means people in the same field, and at the same level of study, as another scientist read their papers, look at their experiments, investigate their results, and give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down. This process opens the door to find weaknesses in experiments, and can often highlight areas that collaboration can occur.

Every discovery is aided by thousands of experiments, and hundreds of scientists working to recreate, confirm, or deny, the discovery. Each of those scientists contributes to the ideas and the ability to discover the validity of those ideas. Each of those scientists is a part of a collaborative process of sharing ideas. A process to find the weak links in logic and replace them with stronger ideas. A process that joins mathematicians with computer programmers with chemists with geologists…

Science is the most advance form of human knowledge. Therefore, the ‘Scientist’ is the most forward thinking human being. However, science is based on observation and experimentation, and both rely on human interpretations. That’s problematic, because human beings are bias. There are three major forms of bias in science: 1) religious. 2) racial. 3) financial.

1) Tycho Brahe, a 16th century Danish astronomer, performed a mountainous amount of very accurate astronomical observations that led to the discovery of Kepler’s laws and Newton’s law of Gravitation. But, his belief in the ‘Church’ Doctrine, at that time, also led him to believe in Geocentrism, the belief the Earth is at the "bulls eye" or exact center of the solar system. His interpretation of an Earth centered was later proven to be wrong.

2) There is a scientific bias for the ‘Evolution of Man’ that allows the views of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer to appear to be right, even though they’re wrong. Today’s scientist "unofficially" allows Social Darwinism to continue, since they do not openly denounce its primeval views of race. As a result, the ‘poorly informed’ interprets the Darwin-Spencer views about race to be correct, even though they are not. Social Darwinism has given certain humans a reason to be bias, by only supporting and maintaining the views of their own kind, even if those views will destroy the quality and right to life for other human beings. For examples, the shooting of human "bad guys" by police officers and the immigration policies around the world are both based on Social Darwinism or "Us Verses Them".

3) There is a strong bias for the Copernican principal; the Evolutionary "tree of life"; and Einstein’s two theories of relativity that will not allow any financial funding for any other ideas that may challenge them. This results in modern science repeating the same mistakes that were made by the 16th ‘Church’ namely, the bias misinterpretation of the true nature of the universe. In other words, all of the ‘hard and tedious’ scientific observations and experiments that are done in the "holy" name of the ‘Scientific Method’ are quite meaningless, if like Brahe, they are not interpreted correctly.

The human superpower, our claim to fame, is our ability to understand the world around us better than any other animal. The better we understand the world, the better we can control it and turn it into a safe and sustaining environment for ourselves.

“Understanding the world,” though, is a really tough job. The world is huge and consists of incredible numbers of moving parts, many of them interconnected. Understanding everything about everything is a monster job, one that will never be completed, but we’re making good progress.

Science is the process by which we do this work. It involves systematically gathering informaion, sometimes by poking nature to reveal what it normally doesn’t, cross-indexing this information, and mentally chewing on it so as to determine what is and isn’t true about the world.

Our ancestors did a lot of guessing, and their guesses about the function of stars gave us some amusingly wrong information like that embodied in astrology. They did a lot of trial-and-error-ing, and that has teased out working and non-working solutions to a lot of problems. Some tried the tack of sitting down and thinking hard about things. This theoretical pondering gave us some brilliant insights, especially about mathematics and philosophy.

Science, modern science, is a synthesis of observation, guesswork, trial-and-error, and reasoning. Coarsely simplified, it’s a system of management, of bureaucracy, for tying these processes together in such a way as to effectively produce valid insights and avoid pollution by false assumptions, incorrect conclusions, wishful thinking and other forms of error. Science is mostly about being very careful to cross all one’s T’s and dotting all one’s I’s, doing everything “by the book” so as to avoid making errors, and to produce information that can be shared among the participants in this work, and built upon. Science is also the body of knowledge that has resulted from doing this kind of work for a few hundred years. Our knowledge of the world keeps growing, thanks to science.

It’s vitally important for us to understand our world. We’re no longer nomads living in some savannah in a warm part of the world, our survival literally depends on it. And science, modern science, is our best method for obtaining this understanding. No other method has as good a track record, no other method gets so much right and so little wrong. To quote biologist Richard Dawkins, “it works, bitches!”