Why us-china trade talks left toughest issues unresolved gas exchange in the lungs occurs due to

In exchange for the United States agreeing to hold off on tariffs on up to billion in Chinese goods, Beijing agreed over the weekend to “substantially reduce” America’s huge trade deficit with China. Beijing made no specific commitment, though.

Beijing refused to knuckle under to a U.S. demand to slash the U.S. trade gap by a specific amount: billion, a figure seen by most economists as wildly unrealistic anyway. The U.S. ran a deficit with China in goods and services last year of billion, including a record billion in goods.

A vague statement the two countries released said next to nothing about the issue at the heart of the dispute between Washington and Beijing: The hardball tactics China uses to challenge U.S. technological supremacy. Those tactics include a requirement that American companies hand over some of their technology in exchange for access to the Chinese market.

U.S. Trade Rep. Robert Lighthizer issued a sharp statement: “Getting China to open its market to more U.S. exports is significant, but the far more important issues revolve around forced technology transfers, cyber theft and the protection of our innovation.”

Some analysts say that for now, Trump might have wanted mainly to smooth over relations with China before his planned June 12 meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The U.S. needs the help of Beijing, which wields influence in Pyongyang, to help seal North Korea’s border and prevent goods from reaching Kim’s regime in violation of international sanctions.

Lighthizer last summer began investigating Beijing’s tactics to challenge U.S. technological dominance. These include outright cyber theft of U.S. companies’ trade secrets and China’s demands that American corporations hand over technology in exchange for access to the Chinese markets.

Last month, the administration proposed tariffs on billion of Chinese imports to protest the forced technology transfers. Trump later ordered Lighthizer to seek up to an additional billion in Chinese goods to tax. China responded by targeting billion in U.S. products, including soybeans — a direct shot at Trump supporters in America’s heartland.

But Frisbie said he wanted to see further progress in addressing U.S. businesses’ complaints about how they are treated in China. In particular, the statement the two sides issued skirted over the key issue of forced technology transfers from the United States to China.

She said the U.S. was distracted by an “ill-advised focus” on the trade deficit. Lovely said the Chinese, who increasingly have their own technology to defend, might be open to strengthening intellectual-property protections and to pressuring local governments to stop demanding technology transfers.

Yet Beijing may not be willing to bargain away its drive to become a technological power in such areas as robotics and artificial intelligence, embodied in its “Made in China 2025” initiative. That project calls for China to develop world-class competitors in fields from information technology to electric cars to pharmaceuticals.