Would strategic bombing work today as well as it did in ww2 against cities page 2 alternate history discussion o gosh

###########

It depends on how you view a tomahawk missile or an F-16 taking out a munitions factory. Is this a tactical strike or a strategic attack? The early gas works park seattle stages of both Iraq wars and the war with Serbia both sought to destroy the infrastructure necessary for the enemy to fight. But they did so with a high volume of largely tactical aircraft rather than a massing of B-52s. I dont think of this as being strategic bombing even though the goal and result were the same.

Regardless, there are a couple of distinctions to keep in mind between warfare now and WWII that affect this question. First, WWI and WWII are not likely to be repeated at least in terms of nations fully mobilizing to fight a war. For one, it takes too long. The US took 2-4 years, depending on your metric to fully mobilize. Likewise, Germany gas 101, UK, France, and the USSR steadily militarized their industrial base in the late 1930s. Germany only kept it up from conquering territory while the UK and USSR required US assistance. With WWI, after three years, France, Germany, Turkey, and AH were barely hanging on while Russia collapsed. Conclusion, by the time you fully mobilize, your economy is barely hanging on. So, total war is likely a relic of history, global thermonuclear war not withstanding.

Second, both those wars involved taking massive amounts of commodities, converting them to dumb weapons, and placing tgask them in the hands of disposable soldiers who were often trained as such. Modern warfare involves advanced weaponry that requires ample training. You dont need to blow up a massive tank plant, you just need to destroy the factory that builds the optical sites or sensors to render that tank, helicopter, or aircraft ineffective. Destory the semiconductor factory and you’re not building new guided missiles for a long time. And those factories can neither be quickly built for mass production nor can their employees be quickly trained. So, there isnt likely to be this mass economic mobilization because it takes too long and is too difficult. The same is true with soldiers although WWII shared some similarities with modern training issues electricity youtube such as with Japanese airmen and how their losses affected air operations.

Click to expand…IOTL there were a bunch of other factors by the time strategic bombing finally collapsed the German economy, aided too electricity in the body causes by the loss of resources on the ground thanks to the advance, but impact was felt in the German economy from at least 1942 on, very muted in 1942 compared to 1943 and 1944 of course. It was strategic bombing that forces the Luftwaffe to stand and die over the skies of German and withdraw a majority of it’s support from the army. Not only that, but from 1941 on the expansion 93 gas near me of air defenses in terms of FLAK, munitions, electronics, some manpower, bunkers, etc. also consumed a disproportionate part of the German economy, well in excess of anything every put into AFV production; it has been estimated that the German army artillery park could have been doubled without the majority investments in home defense FLAK. So even before counting the impact of bomb damage and industrial dispersion, as well as labor hours lost due to dehousing of workers/absenteeism, the impact on the ground war of the major resource consumption of forcing the Germans to invest heavily in air defense, both from the Luftwaffe and ground defenses, was heavily felt in the ground war.

In the absence of the OTL ground campaign, which sped up the impact of the strategic air war, the strategic bombing campaign would still have collapsed electricity 101 the German fuel production, transportation, city life, etc. just about on time; even before Romania was overrun by the Soviets, Romanian oil production getting to Germany was pretty much collapsed by the aerial mining of the Danube f gas certification logo and the collapsing rail situation due to air attacks. In terms of fuel alone once the Wallies make major dents in production the Luftwaffe will fall apart; even before that though the Luftwaffe fighter force was destroyed in early 1944 due to attrition. Even if the Eastern Front ended in 1943 the Germans would still have already cut pilot training and fuel allocations and the vicious circle of losses would inevitably lead to OTL TL of Luftwaffe fighter force death.

The USSBS didn’t really ignore the ground factors, they examined what the achieved and it was undeniable that alone strategic bombing achieved strategic success. The ground situation in 1945 when strategic bombing really achieved it’s final goal was directly related to the bombing successes of 1943-44 creating the conditions for the ground success on all fronts. With the Luftwaffe having a much more minor impact on the ground war power per kwh all Allied forces directly benefited, the Soviets more than anyone.