Young evangelicals and climate change the way of improvement leads home gas in babies that breastfeed


Climate science isn’t questioned at Wheaton College the way it often is in the wider evangelical community. The school is a brick-and-mortar rebuttal to the myth that science and religion must be at odds with each other. When Wheaton students step into their-state-of-the-art science building, for instance, they are greeted with signs stating that a “sound Biblical theology gives us a proper basis for scientific inquiry,” and a display featuring locally excavated Perry the Mastodon, which carbon dating shows to be more than 13,000 years old.

The school is not alone in intertwining commitments to love God and protect the earth, often referred to as “ creation care.” The Cape Town Commitment, a global agreement between evangelical leaders from nearly 200 countries, includes acknowledgement of climate change and how it will hurt the world’s poor (and it is required reading for Wheaton freshmen). Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech University and an evangelical, has been an outspoken advocate for climate action. electricity tattoo designs And in addition to YECA, there are numerous groups active in this arena, including the Evangelical Climate Initiative, Climate Caretakers, Care of Creation and A Rocha.

In late 2015, the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE)—the biggest umbrella group of evangelicals in the country, representing 43 million Americans—issued a statement accepting climate change, acknowledging the human contribution to it and encouraging action. YECA’s advocacy helped bring that statement, called “ Loving the Least of These,” into being. In it, NAE argues that Christians should be compelled to care about climate change as a matter of social justice, equating those without the resources to adapt to failed farming or dry wells or rising seas as the modern-day equivalents of the widows and orphans of Jesus’s day.

I went to the WHO site. gas explosion The headline figure they used as an estimate was 4.8 million deaths from external air pollution. It was an estimate. The site also listed between three and four million death estimates from internal pollution which equates to cooking and heating fumes. electricity synonyms I am not trying to be cute here, Alex, but this second type of pollution could be remedied by transitioning to freeze dried foods, heavy woolen clothing, and top notch sleeping bags. I couldn’t believe the WHO had the audacity to lump internal cooking and heating with air pollution from factories and internal combustion engines. Of course, it allowed them to achieve a more alarming aggregate figure.

I found some other sites on the subject where the findings were more tempered. Instead of the dramatic seven million figure there was a more modest set of estimates about the supposed number of months taken from people’s lives because of external air pollution. frictional electricity examples What did this air pollution supposedly cause? The studies suggest stroke, heart disease, COPD, and other respiratory diseases such as pneumonia. The problem is obviously establishing a proximate link between a man in China having a heart attack and the air pollution. He might have been a heavy cigarette smoker.

But a lot of these disputable facts are not all that relevant for our legislators. The most polluted countries were not in North America. The Chinese, Pakistanis, Indians, Egyptians, and others were the big air polluters. gas utility austin Maybe the environmental crusaders at Wheaton College should start a letter-writing campaign to the heads of state in these countries.

James, it might be my open market idealism, but I think you’re getting ahead of yourself talking about legislators and letter writing campaigns. The first step is deciding what energy *we* buy for our homes, and our churches. And like I said, we can make solar and electric vehicles affordable for China, Pakistan, India, Egypt, and others by buying it for ourselves, the same way we made cell phones affordable for everyone. Except instead of getting everyone on Facebook, the effect would be that it saves more lives than World Peace!

Or if you just want to consider your direct effects on Americans, and don’t really think the market has that kind of power, it’s still true for America. power usage estimator More Americans die from air pollution than from war and murder combined. MIT estimates 200,000 Americans die from air pollution every year. 53,000 from transportation, 52,000 from power generation, the rest from industry, cooking, heating, and various. Surely that should be a significant factor in our personal energy choice if we value the sanctity of life.

I am still a bit skeptical of all of these studies which allege high death rates owing to air pollution. There is an academic bias to support studies which favor global warming alarms. Serious scientists, who write proposals for study funding showing the opposite, are generally not granted money. In other words, if you are a global warming denier, don’t bother applying.

As an interesting aside, my father and hs siblings were reared in an Appalachian coal town during the first half of the 20th Century. One of my aunts told me that they couldn’t hang clothes out to dry when the mine was running because the there was so much coal dust in the air. It would cover the wet clothing. Obviously, everyone was breathing that dust. I personally would not have liked inhaling that stuff, but the only members of my father’s family who had respiratory problems later in life were the cigarette smokers. My point is that certain environmental studies can start with a bias. gas laws worksheet If a group of researchers wants to indict carbon fuels, it isn’t difficult to do.